State-by-state coverage

SSO Data By State

Not all states report sewer overflow data with equal completeness. Here is what we know about coverage quality in every state, plus links to each state's environmental agency.

Sewage Monitor's primary data comes from EPA ECHO, which aggregates SSO reports that utilities submit to their state environmental agencies. But the quality and completeness of those reports varies dramatically from state to state — based on when electronic reporting was adopted, how aggressively permit conditions are enforced, and whether the state operates its own parallel reporting system.

The table below reflects our research-based assessment of each state's current ECHO data coverage. High means we have strong confidence the database captures most reportable events. Low means significant underreporting is likely. Unknown means we lack enough information to make an assessment.

Coverage ratings are our editorial assessments based on public EPA enforcement records, GAO findings, and state-specific research. They are not official EPA designations. As the Phase 2 eRule is fully implemented, we expect coverage ratings to improve across all states over 2025–2026.

HighMediumLowUnknown— reporting completeness ratings
StateAbbrEPA RegionReporting SystemECHO CoverageAgency
AlabamaALRegion 4NetDMRLowAgency site
AlaskaAKRegion 10NetDMRUnknownAgency site
ArizonaAZRegion 9NetDMRMediumAgency site
ArkansasARRegion 6NetDMRLowAgency site
CaliforniaCARegion 9CIWQS (state)LowAgency site
ColoradoCORegion 8NetDMRMediumAgency site
ConnecticutCTRegion 1NetDMRMediumAgency site
DelawareDERegion 3NetDMRMediumAgency site
FloridaFLRegion 4NetDMRHighAgency site
GeorgiaGARegion 4NetDMRMediumAgency site
HawaiiHIRegion 9NetDMRUnknownAgency site
IdahoIDRegion 10NetDMRUnknownAgency site
IllinoisILRegion 5NetDMRMediumAgency site
IndianaINRegion 5NetDMRMediumAgency site
IowaIARegion 7NetDMRMediumAgency site
KansasKSRegion 7NetDMRMediumAgency site
KentuckyKYRegion 4NetDMRMediumAgency site
LouisianaLARegion 6NetDMRLowAgency site
MaineMERegion 1NetDMRMediumAgency site
MarylandMDRegion 3NetDMRHighAgency site
MassachusettsMARegion 1NetDMRHighAgency site
MichiganMIRegion 5NetDMRHighAgency site
MinnesotaMNRegion 5NetDMRMediumAgency site
MississippiMSRegion 4NetDMRLowAgency site
MissouriMORegion 7NetDMRMediumAgency site
MontanaMTRegion 8NetDMRUnknownAgency site
NebraskaNERegion 7NetDMRMediumAgency site
NevadaNVRegion 9NetDMRLowAgency site
New HampshireNHRegion 1NetDMRMediumAgency site
New JerseyNJRegion 2NetDMRHighAgency site
New MexicoNMRegion 6NetDMRLowAgency site
New YorkNYRegion 2NetDMRHighAgency site
North CarolinaNCRegion 4NetDMRHighAgency site
North DakotaNDRegion 8NetDMRUnknownAgency site
OhioOHRegion 5NetDMRHighAgency site
OklahomaOKRegion 6NetDMRLowAgency site
OregonORRegion 10NetDMRMediumAgency site
PennsylvaniaPARegion 3NetDMRHighAgency site
Rhode IslandRIRegion 1NetDMRMediumAgency site
South CarolinaSCRegion 4NetDMRMediumAgency site
South DakotaSDRegion 8NetDMRUnknownAgency site
TennesseeTNRegion 4NetDMRMediumAgency site
TexasTXRegion 6NetDMRMediumAgency site
UtahUTRegion 8NetDMRLowAgency site
VermontVTRegion 1NetDMRMediumAgency site
VirginiaVARegion 3NetDMRHighAgency site
WashingtonWARegion 10NetDMRMediumAgency site
West VirginiaWVRegion 3NetDMRLowAgency site
WisconsinWIRegion 5NetDMRHighAgency site
WyomingWYRegion 8NetDMRUnknownAgency site

Note: California's Low rating reflects ECHO specifically; California reports richly to its own CIWQS system.

Key States to Watch

California

Low* in ECHO / Rich in CIWQS

California operates the most active SSO reporting program of any state — but almost none of it flows into the federal ECHO database. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) administers the Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) Order, which requires all publicly owned collection system agencies to report SSOs through the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS). CIWQS data is detailed and publicly accessible but separate from federal infrastructure. California's 2006 statewide WDR was one of the most comprehensive SSO regulatory frameworks enacted by any state, predating the federal eRule by nearly two decades. For California-specific data, go directly to the SWRCB's CIWQS public SSO portal.

CIWQS Public SSO Portal

Texas

Medium

Texas has more NPDES-permitted wastewater facilities than any other state — over 2,000 collection systems and treatment plants. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) administers the TPDES (Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) program. Texas utilities report spills to TCEQ and the data flows to ECHO, but coverage quality varies significantly across the state's vast geography. Rural utilities and smaller systems in the Rio Grande Valley, where poverty rates are high and infrastructure is aging, are particularly likely to be underrepresented. Texas is also notable for the scale of its storm-related overflow events — Hurricane Harvey (2017) and Winter Storm Uri (2021) each caused hundreds of documented SSOs.

TCEQ Wastewater Division

Florida

High

Florida has relatively strong SSO reporting in ECHO, in part because the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has aggressively enforced reporting requirements and because the state's sensitive water bodies — the Everglades watershed, Indian River Lagoon, Tampa Bay, numerous springs — create strong regulatory and political pressure for compliance. Florida also has a large number of small utility systems, many serving coastal municipalities, that discharge to highly sensitive waters where even modest overflows can trigger beach closures and public health advisories. The state's flat topography and high groundwater table create I/I challenges throughout.

FDEP Domestic Wastewater Program

Ohio

High

Ohio has some of the most complete SSO data in ECHO among Midwest states. Ohio EPA has required electronic reporting through NetDMR for years and has been proactive in following up on SSO compliance. The state also administers significant State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan programs for sewer infrastructure, and receiving those loans typically requires strong reporting compliance. Ohio's largest cities — Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Akron — have all been under federal consent decrees requiring major sewer system improvements, which generates rigorous documentation of SSO events. The Great Lakes basin context adds federal pressure on water quality compliance.

Ohio EPA Surface Water Division

New York

High

New York presents a complex picture because the state operates both combined sewer systems (in New York City and dozens of older upstate cities) and separate sanitary sewer systems across the rest of the state. CSO and SSO data are reported through different frameworks, and the NYSDEC has historically been more rigorous about CSO Long-Term Control Plans than SSO-specific tracking. New York City's DEP operates what may be the most extensive CSO infrastructure program in the country, with a comprehensive Green Infrastructure program. SSO events outside NYC — in suburban and rural areas — are covered in ECHO but with varying completeness depending on the size and resources of the utility.

NYSDEC SPDES Program

Mississippi, Louisiana & Alabama

Low

The Gulf South states present some of the most concerning data gaps in the ECHO database. Mississippi's sewer infrastructure, particularly in rural areas and historically underinvested communities of color, is severely degraded — and reporting to the state and federal databases is correspondingly incomplete. The MDEQ has faced chronic underfunding that limits both inspection capacity and enforcement. Louisiana has similar challenges, particularly in the greater New Orleans area and along the Mississippi River industrial corridor. Alabama's ADEM has improved reporting in recent years but rural counties still have significant gaps. Multiple environmental justice organizations have documented the disproportionate burden of inadequate sewer infrastructure in Black and low-income communities across this region. These states likely have among the highest ratios of unreported to reported SSOs in the country.

MDEQ Wastewater Permits

Coverage Will Improve as EPA Phase 2 eRule Is Fully Implemented

The EPA's Electronic Reporting Rule requires all NPDES-permitted wastewater facilities to submit compliance data electronically. The Phase 2 requirements for wastewater facilities took effect in late 2022 for large systems and are continuing to roll out for medium and small systems through 2025–2026.

As more utilities come into electronic reporting compliance, ECHO data coverage will become more uniform across states. The states currently rated "Low" or "Unknown" are likely to see their event counts increase substantially as this transition completes — not because more overflows are occurring, but because reporting is finally capturing events that were always happening but never reaching the federal database.